ProseMap

Scored sample

A personal essay, mapped

This is a real ProseMap analysis of a 1,000-word essay, shown as plain text and a static map. The essay is controlled and specific for most of its length and loses its footing for one paragraph in the middle. That paragraph is the red-underlined run.

The analysis was produced by ProseMap's AI models and then frozen, so what you see here is exactly what the app shows when you open this sample, and exactly what appears in ProseMap's demo videos. It cost $0.33 to run. Opening it costs nothing.

Overall64
Sentence76
Flow76
Arc78

A sharp, concrete memoir about clearing a father's garage. Nearly every scene works and the ending lands. One paragraph of vague musing breaks the spell and ends on two unrelated sentences. The overall score includes a 12-point penalty for the weak run.

What He KeptThe first SaturdayThe middle shelvesWhat went in the truckSentence 1: 84 (Strong)Sentence 2: 82 (Strong)Sentence 3: 86 (Strong)Sentence 4: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 5: 82 (Strong)Sentence 6: 72 (Acceptable)Sentence 7: 85 (Strong)Sentence 8: 82 (Strong)Sentence 9: 90 (Exceptional)Sentence 10: 78 (Acceptable)Sentence 11: 88 (Strong)Sentence 12: 86 (Strong)Sentence 13: 87 (Strong)Sentence 14: 82 (Acceptable)Sentence 15: 85 (Strong)Sentence 16: 78 (Acceptable)Sentence 17: 88 (Strong)Sentence 18: 74 (Acceptable)Sentence 19: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 20: 84 (Strong)Sentence 21: 72 (Acceptable)Sentence 22: 86 (Strong)Sentence 23: 76 (Acceptable)Sentence 24: 74 (Acceptable)Sentence 25: 88 (Strong)Sentence 26: 46 (Weak)Sentence 27: 32 (Failing)Sentence 28: 26 (Failing)Sentence 29: 30 (Failing)Sentence 30: 27 (Failing)Sentence 31: 20 (Failing)Sentence 32: 48 (Weak)Sentence 33: 35 (Failing)Sentence 34: 84 (Acceptable)Sentence 35: 90 (Exceptional)Sentence 36: 86 (Strong)Sentence 37: 85 (Strong)Sentence 38: 76 (Acceptable)Sentence 39: 88 (Strong)Sentence 40: 84 (Acceptable)Sentence 41: 74 (Acceptable)Sentence 42: 88 (Strong)Sentence 43: 82 (Strong)Sentence 44: 90 (Exceptional)Sentence 45: 88 (Strong)Sentence 46: 70 (Acceptable)Sentence 47: 72 (Acceptable)Sentence 48: 74 (Acceptable)Sentence 49: 84 (Strong)Sentence 50: 74 (Acceptable)Sentence 51: 84 (Acceptable)Sentence 52: 76 (Acceptable)Sentence 53: 88 (Strong)Sentence 54: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 55: 76 (Acceptable)Sentence 56: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 57: 88 (Strong)Sentence 58: 84 (Strong)Sentence 59: 88 (Strong)Sentence 60: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 61: 82 (Acceptable)Sentence 62: 84 (Acceptable)Sentence 63: 88 (Strong)Sentence 64: 91 (Exceptional)
FailingWeakMixed signalsAcceptableStrongExceptionalwider gap = weaker handoffred underline = sustained weak run
Each bar is one sentence, laid out in reading order under its section heading. Bar length follows sentence length.

Where a revision would pay off most

Sustained weak run: sentences 26–33

8 consecutive sentences stay under the working band (mean 32). Fixing the first handoff usually lifts the whole stretch.

Paragraph 7 circles: 57% restatement

Handoffs are smooth but information is not moving. Cut or merge rather than polish.

Short is not the same as weak

The map is not asking for every sentence to be long, smooth or green. These short sentences were marked as controlled fractures, abrupt on purpose, and scored among the strongest in the piece.

SentenceScore
You pulled the chain and waited.82
The coffee cans were not easy.82
I kept one can.86

After one note

The writer left a single note on the weak paragraph: cut the generalising, stay in the garage, say what was actually on the middle shelves. ProseMap drafted a revision from that note and the revision was analysed again.

ScoreBeforeAfterChange
Overall6482+18
Sentence7681+5
Flow7681+5
Arc7885+7
What He KeptThe first SaturdayThe middle shelvesWhat went in the truckSentence 1: 85 (Strong)Sentence 2: 82 (Acceptable)Sentence 3: 88 (Strong)Sentence 4: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 5: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 6: 72 (Acceptable)Sentence 7: 84 (Strong)Sentence 8: 81 (Acceptable)Sentence 9: 88 (Strong)Sentence 10: 76 (Acceptable)Sentence 11: 86 (Strong)Sentence 12: 84 (Strong)Sentence 13: 88 (Strong)Sentence 14: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 15: 82 (Acceptable)Sentence 16: 78 (Acceptable)Sentence 17: 84 (Strong)Sentence 18: 74 (Acceptable)Sentence 19: 78 (Acceptable)Sentence 20: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 21: 70 (Acceptable)Sentence 22: 82 (Acceptable)Sentence 23: 74 (Acceptable)Sentence 24: 76 (Acceptable)Sentence 25: 88 (Strong)Sentence 26: 76 (Acceptable)Sentence 27: 82 (Strong)Sentence 28: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 29: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 30: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 31: 82 (Acceptable)Sentence 32: 84 (Acceptable)Sentence 33: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 34: 86 (Strong)Sentence 35: 78 (Acceptable)Sentence 36: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 37: 72 (Acceptable)Sentence 38: 87 (Strong)Sentence 39: 82 (Acceptable)Sentence 40: 72 (Acceptable)Sentence 41: 88 (Strong)Sentence 42: 85 (Strong)Sentence 43: 89 (Strong)Sentence 44: 86 (Strong)Sentence 45: 72 (Acceptable)Sentence 46: 75 (Acceptable)Sentence 47: 75 (Acceptable)Sentence 48: 82 (Strong)Sentence 49: 72 (Acceptable)Sentence 50: 84 (Strong)Sentence 51: 74 (Acceptable)Sentence 52: 86 (Strong)Sentence 53: 80 (Acceptable)Sentence 54: 74 (Acceptable)Sentence 55: 76 (Acceptable)Sentence 56: 82 (Acceptable)Sentence 57: 83 (Acceptable)Sentence 58: 88 (Strong)Sentence 59: 78 (Acceptable)Sentence 60: 76 (Acceptable)Sentence 61: 82 (Acceptable)Sentence 62: 87 (Strong)Sentence 63: 90 (Exceptional)
The revised essay. The weak run is gone, and with it the 12-point penalty. Most of the map did not change, because most of the essay did not need to.

The original text, sentence by sentence

Underline and tint show each sentence's band. Hover a sentence for its score.

What He Kept

The first Saturday

My father's garage had one working light, a bare bulb on a pull chain that he had wired himself in 1987 and never touched again. You pulled the chain and waited. Then the whole room came up at once: the workbench, the pegboard with the outline of every tool drawn around it in marker, the shelves of coffee cans, the lawnmower that had not started since the Clinton administration. My sister stood in the doorway with a roll of contractor bags and said we had until Sunday night. The buyers wanted the keys on Monday.

We started with what was obviously trash. That took an hour, filled four bags, and taught us exactly the wrong lesson, which was that most of this would be easy. The coffee cans were not easy. Each one held a single category of hardware, sorted by a man who believed in categories: wood screws by length, machine screws by thread, washers, cotter pins, one can of nothing but the small brass rings that come off the ends of lamp cords. He had labelled them in pencil on masking tape. The tape had gone the colour of weak tea.

I kept one can. I did not tell her which.

The lawnmower was the first argument. She wanted it on the curb; I wanted to see if it would start, which it would not, and which I knew. I pulled the cord six times anyway. On the seventh the smell of old fuel came up out of it like a Saturday from 1994, and I let her put it on the curb, and a man in a van took it within the hour.

By noon we had a system. Anything with his handwriting on it went into a box by the door, for deciding later. Anything that still worked went to the curb under a sign that said FREE, and by two o'clock the neighbourhood had taken the bench grinder, the extension ladder, and a sledgehammer neither of us could lift. Everything else went in the truck. The truck went to the dump twice before dark, and on the second trip my sister drove while I sat with a box of his drill bits on my knees because there was nowhere else to put it.

The middle shelves

The second day was the shelves along the back wall, and that is where the work changed. These were not tools. They were the things he had kept because keeping was easier than deciding: tax returns from the seventies, an outboard motor for a boat he sold before I was born, a box of my mother's letters that we both saw and neither of us opened.

It is hard to say what it means to keep things like that. There is a sense in which objects hold meaning, and a sense in which the meaning is really something we bring to them, and it is perhaps not always clear which is which. In some ways the garage was a kind of record, and in other ways it was more of a reflection of who he was as a person. It was, in a sense, his way of holding on to the things that mattered to him. Keeping things was how he dealt with what was important. It seems like it might be the case that most people do something similar, at least to some extent, though it is probably not really possible to say for certain. Our neighbour across the street has been restoring a motorcycle in his driveway for the better part of a decade. The weather that weekend was unseasonably warm for October.

What broke the spell was the motor. My sister found a receipt taped to its housing, dated July 1979, for a rebuild he had paid a man forty dollars to do, and under the receipt, in his pencil, a note: runs rough, don't sell. He had kept a thing he knew was broken because he had written down that it was broken. That was the whole system. We put the motor in the truck. She kept the note.

What went in the truck

By Sunday afternoon the room was mostly floor. We had not seen the floor in thirty years. It was painted grey, and in front of the workbench there was a pale oval where the paint had worn through to concrete, which was where he had stood. I stood in it. It fit. My sister took a picture of me there, and then a picture of the pegboard with its marker outlines, every shape now empty: a hammer-shaped gap, a saw-shaped gap, a gap the shape of a tool neither of us could name.

We kept three things apart from the box by the door:

the pencil note from the motor

the can of brass rings

a tape measure that only went to twelve feet, which he had used anyway

The tape measure was my sister's idea. She said he had measured every board in the house with it, and if the house was still standing then twelve feet was evidently enough. I could not argue with that. I have stopped trying to argue with that.

The buyers came Monday with a contractor, who looked up at the one bulb and said he would have to redo all of it. He was right. My father had known that too. It was on a list, in pencil, on the back of a seed packet pinned to the pegboard under the words things to fix, and he had crossed off the three items above it over a span of eleven years. The light was next. It had been next for a while.

I drove home with the can of brass rings on the passenger seat. It rattled on the turns. Somewhere around the state line I understood that I did not want them for lamp cords; I had never in my life repaired a lamp cord. I wanted the handwriting. I wanted to be the kind of person who had a can for that.

ProseMap's scores and explanations are produced by AI models. They can be wrong, incomplete or misleading, and they are one reader's judgment rather than an objective measure of writing quality. Check anything that matters independently.